NationStates: Dominion of Caramida
NationStates: Dominion of Caramida
( Read more... )
Lastly, would you want to eat this?
( Picture of a grebe below the cut! )
I'm not certain which policy I should adopt, so I'm going to offer it to my Privy Council (aka you guys). After hearing from you, I reserve the right to make my own decision, after taking your comments under advisement.
Now it's time to experiment with polling.
[Poll #806645]Edited to add: PLEASE NOTE: The 'comments' hyperlink in the poll links to an old post. Don't try respond via that link. I can't edit it. D'oh!
NationStates: Dominion of Caramida
O Caramida!
Anyway, this is all to announce the foundation of the Dominion of Caramida. I'll be taking nominations for our National Anthem, if you like. The first issue was whether voting should be compulsory, with a couple of valid arguments on all sides. I decided to legalize compulsory voting in the Dominion, and I look forward to seeing what comes of it. In Caramida, we don't care what you vote for, only that you vote for something.
I imagine there ought to be a BuggerOff party, for those who refuse to vote for anyone else. They oughtn't have a platform other than "Keep Your Stinking Paws Off". If the voters were to elect them into the Government though, we'd definitely have to let the BuggerOffs repeal the compulsory voting thing, if they wanted to.
For those of you looking to be depressed,
There's a Newsweek political cartoon this week showing a couple looking on at a Jeremiah carrying a sign that reads "The End is Near". The man looks to his friend and says, "That used to be funny."
Welcome to the desert of the surreal.
Also, I just read an article about Oliver Stone's film, World Trade Center, which is coming out soon. I don't know if I'm looking forward to sobbing in the theater, but I think I perhaps shall see this one anyway.
In happier news,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
We couldn't make this s**t up.
name_redacted, I assume you've already heard this one. After Oklahoma City, the Armed Forces really tightened up their requirements for entry, specifically with an eye towards weeding out the white supremacists, and Christian extremists. Recently though, in the wake of increasing recruitment pressures, the Defense Department has apparently relaxed these restrictions. So basically, in order to fight the war against foreign terrorists, we're training our future domestic terrorists. So we're now seeing Aryan Nations graffiti in Baghdad, a predictable (although unintentioned) result of such policies. When these guys come home with weapons and explosives training, what other predictable results might we expect? Just another example of your administration making the world safe
for from terrorists.
Well, there goes my good mood.
Credit where credit is due:
- With no thanks to Kingdaddy, for the information. I don't know why I read this guy who depresses me so much, except that he's one of the most cogent foreign policy analysts I've read, and an all-around smart guy, too boot.
- The icon comes from Doonesbury, by Gary Trudeau.
From the WWarchinves...
The biggest threat to democracy is not kooks with guns. It is the unbridled power of the government over it's citizens, which historically has always been used (abused) in the name of preservation.[Posted on Brick's50-ver2, out in the world.]
The Immigration Debate
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Another amazing, although somewhat heartbreaking treatment of the issue can be found here, in the journal of the singular
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Kim and Vito, you are real-life heroes.
Edited to add: Stephen Colbert is a hero, too, but I don't believe he's real. That's what my gut tells me.
Remembering Columbia
( Read more... )
Researchers find Republicans unreasonable (yes, and Democrats, too).
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Then, the brain centers for reward were tripped. "Essentially," Drew Westen, Emory University's director of clinical psychology notes, "it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones."
Subjects shown contradictory statements by candidates denied their own candidates contradictions, but detected contradictions in the opposing candidate.
So basically, if you feel passionately about politics, then you don't think clearly about politcs?
That's kind of sobering.
Westen's findings will be presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology meeting in tomorrow in Palm Springs.